Melton v. State

674 So. 2d 870, 1996 Fla. App. LEXIS 5467, 1996 WL 277064
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Melton v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 678 So. 2d 434
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided May 28, 1996·No. No. 95-963·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Appellant pled guilty to burglary after the trial court informed him that the court would not accept a nolo contendere plea. Because appellant’s “straight up” nolo plea was proper and authorized, the trial court should not have rejected the plea. See Boykin v. Garrison, 658 So.2d 1090 (Fla. 4th DCA), rev. denied, 664 So.2d 248 (Fla.1995). We will treat the plea as one of nolo contendere, and we affirm the remaining issue on the authority of Dennis v. State, 673 So.2d 881 (Fla. 1st DCA 1996). We remand the case to the trial court for correction of the judgment, which is affirmed as corrected.

MINER and LAWRENCE, JJ., and SMITH, Senior Judge, concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Melton v. State, 674 So. 2d 870, 1996 Fla. App. LEXIS 5467, 1996 WL 277064 (Fla. Ct. App. 1996).

674 So. 2d 870 (Melton v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Boykin v. Garrison
658 So. 2d 1090 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1995)
Dennis v. State
673 So. 2d 881 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1996)