Melton v. State
This text of 674 So. 2d 870 (Melton v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Appellant pled guilty to burglary after the trial court informed him that the court would not accept a nolo contendere plea. Because appellant’s “straight up” nolo plea was proper and authorized, the trial court should not have rejected the plea. See Boykin v. Garrison, 658 So.2d 1090 (Fla. 4th DCA), rev. denied, 664 So.2d 248 (Fla.1995). We will treat the plea as one of nolo contendere, and we affirm the remaining issue on the authority of Dennis v. State, 673 So.2d 881 (Fla. 1st DCA 1996). We remand the case to the trial court for correction of the judgment, which is affirmed as corrected.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
674 So. 2d 870, 1996 Fla. App. LEXIS 5467, 1996 WL 277064, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/melton-v-state-fladistctapp-1996.