Melick v. Metropolitan Life Insurance
91 A. 1070, 85 N.J.L. 727, 56 Vroom 727, 1914 N.J. LEXIS 208
This text of 91 A. 1070 (Melick v. Metropolitan Life Insurance) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of New Jersey primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Melick v. Metropolitan Life Insurance, 91 A. 1070, 85 N.J.L. 727, 56 Vroom 727, 1914 N.J. LEXIS 208 (N.J. 1914).
Opinion
The judgment under review herein should be affirmed, for the reasons expressed in the opinion delivered by Mr. Justice Garrison in the Supreme Court.
For affirmance — The Chancellor, Trbnchard, Bergen, Kaliscu, Bogert, Yeedenburgh, Congdon, White, JJ. 8.
For reversal — The Chief Justice, Parker, Heppenheimer, JJ. 3.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Mims v. Houston Fire & Casualty Insurance Company
362 S.W.2d 880 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 1962)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
91 A. 1070, 85 N.J.L. 727, 56 Vroom 727, 1914 N.J. LEXIS 208, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/melick-v-metropolitan-life-insurance-nj-1914.