Melick v. Metropolitan Life Insurance

91 A. 1070, 85 N.J.L. 727, 56 Vroom 727, 1914 N.J. LEXIS 208

Supreme Court of New Jersey·Decided March 16, 1914·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

Per Curiam.

The judgment under review herein should be affirmed, for the reasons expressed in the opinion delivered by Mr. Justice Garrison in the Supreme Court.

For affirmance — The Chancellor, Trbnchard, Bergen, Kaliscu, Bogert, Yeedenburgh, Congdon, White, JJ. 8.

For reversal — The Chief Justice, Parker, Heppenheimer, JJ. 3.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Melick v. Metropolitan Life Insurance, 91 A. 1070, 85 N.J.L. 727, 56 Vroom 727, 1914 N.J. LEXIS 208 (N.J. 1914).

Pincite

91 A. 1070 (Melick v. Metropolitan Life Insurance) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.