Home/District Court of Appeal of Florida/Melendez v. State

Melendez v. State

787 So. 2d 33, 2001 Fla. App. LEXIS 1323, 2001 WL 120374
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedFebruary 14, 2001
DocketNo. 2D00-4520
StatusPublished

This text of 787 So. 2d 33 (Melendez v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Melendez v. State, 787 So. 2d 33, 2001 Fla. App. LEXIS 1323, 2001 WL 120374 (Fla. Ct. App. 2001).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Nestor Melendez appeals the summary denial of his motion to correct illegal sentence filed pursuant to Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.800(a), alleging that [34]*34he is entitled to be resentenced under the supreme court’s decision in Heggs v. State, 759 So.2d 620 (Fla.2000). We affirm without prejudice to any right Melendez might have to file a rule 3.850 motion challenging the voluntary and intelligent nature of his plea pursuant to Murphy v. State, 773 So.2d 1174 (Fla. 2d DCA 2000).

Affirmed.

PARKER, A.C.J., and NORTHCUTT and CASANUEVA, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Murphy v. State
773 So. 2d 1174 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2000)
Heggs v. State
759 So. 2d 620 (Supreme Court of Florida, 2000)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
787 So. 2d 33, 2001 Fla. App. LEXIS 1323, 2001 WL 120374, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/melendez-v-state-fladistctapp-2001.