Melendez v. Fizer
This text of 328 F. App'x 530 (Melendez v. Fizer) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
MEMORANDUM
Arizona state prisoner Louis Alfonso Melendez appeals pro se from the district court’s order denying his Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 60(b) motion for relief from the judgment denying his 28 U.S.C. § 2254 habeas petition. We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2253. We review for abuse of discretion, Harvest v. Castro, 531 F.3d 737, 741 (9th Cir.2008), and affirm.
The district court properly determined that Melendez presented no argument or evidence in his Rule 60(b) motion that would justify relief from the final judgment denying his § 2254 petition as procedurally barred.
AFFIRMED.
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
328 F. App'x 530, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/melendez-v-fizer-ca9-2009.