Meissner v. Moore

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Meissner v. Moore

770 So. 2d 708, 2000 Fla. App. LEXIS 13219, 2000 WL 1508499

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedOctober 12, 2000

DocketNo. 1D00-2293

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 770 So. 2d 708 (Meissner v. Moore) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Meissner v. Moore, 770 So. 2d 708, 2000 Fla. App. LEXIS 13219, 2000 WL 1508499 (Fla. Ct. App. 2000).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

We dismiss the appeal with respect to Wilkes, Wilkerson, and Mills for lack of jurisdiction. The trial court dismissed the complaint without prejudice but with leave to amend the complaint. This portion of the order is non-final and non-appealable. See Augustin v. Blount, Inc., 573 So.2d 104 (Fla. 1st DCA 1991). The dismissal is without prejudice to the appellant to file a [709]*709new appeal upon the trial court’s entry of final judgment.

BOOTH, ALLEN, and PADOVANO, JJ., CONCUR.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

We dismiss the appeal with respect to Wilkes, Wilkerson, and Mills for lack of jurisdiction. The trial court dismissed the complaint without prejudice but with leave to amend the complaint. This portion of the order is non-final and non-appealable. See Augustin v. Blount, Inc., 573 So.2d 104 (Fla. 1st DCA 1991). The dismissal is without prejudice to the appellant to file a [709]*709new appeal upon the trial court’s entry of final judgment.

BOOTH, ALLEN, and PADOVANO, JJ., CONCUR.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

770 So. 2d 708, 2000 Fla. App. LEXIS 13219, 2000 WL 1508499, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/meissner-v-moore-fladistctapp-2000.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack