Meissner v. Moore
770 So. 2d 708, 2000 Fla. App. LEXIS 13219, 2000 WL 1508499
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided October 12, 2000·No. No. 1D00-2293·Published·Cited by 1 cases
Opinion
We dismiss the appeal with respect to Wilkes, Wilkerson, and Mills for lack of jurisdiction. The trial court dismissed the complaint without prejudice but with leave to amend the complaint. This portion of the order is non-final and non-appealable. See Augustin v. Blount, Inc., 573 So.2d 104 (Fla. 1st DCA 1991). The dismissal is without prejudice to the appellant to file a [709] new appeal upon the trial court’s entry of final judgment.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Meissner v. Moore, 770 So. 2d 708, 2000 Fla. App. LEXIS 13219, 2000 WL 1508499 (Fla. Ct. App. 2000).
770 So. 2d 708 (Meissner v. Moore) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Bates v. Neuropsychological Associates of Central Florida, Inc.
806 So. 2d 636 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2002)