Bates v. Neuropsychological Associates of Central Florida, Inc.
806 So. 2d 636, 2002 Fla. App. LEXIS 1345, 2002 WL 205822
Opinion
Having considered the appellant’s response to the order to show cause, we hereby dismiss this appeal .as premature because the order appealed is a nonfinal, nonappealable order. See Meissner v. Moore, 770 So.2d 708 (Fla. 1st DCA 2000); Augustin v. Blount, 573 So.2d 104, 105 [637] (Fla. 1st DCA 1991); Odham v. Mouat, 484 So.2d 95, 96 (Fla. 1st DCA 1986).
DISMISSED.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Bates v. Neuropsychological Associates of Central Florida, Inc., 806 So. 2d 636, 2002 Fla. App. LEXIS 1345, 2002 WL 205822 (Fla. Ct. App. 2002).
806 So. 2d 636 (Bates v. Neuropsychological Associates of Central Florida, Inc.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Augustin v. Blount, Inc.
573 So. 2d 104 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1991)
Odham v. Mouat
484 So. 2d 95 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1986)
Meissner v. Moore
770 So. 2d 708 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2000)