Meily v. Agricultural Investment Corp.
This text of 276 So. 2d 161 (Meily v. Agricultural Investment Corp.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinions
By petition for writ of certiorari, we are requested to review a decision of the District Court of Appeal, Third District, which allegedly conflicts with a prior decision of the District Court of Appeal, First District.
Our initial examination of the petition and record suggested a possible jurisdictional conflict. We issued the writ and have heard arguments on both jurisdiction and the merits.
After a thorough consideration of the petition, record, briefs and argument, we are now led to conclude that no jurisdictional conflict of decisions is present. Finding, therefore, that the writ was improvidently issued, it is hereby discharged.
It is so ordered.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
276 So. 2d 161, 1973 Fla. LEXIS 4574, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/meily-v-agricultural-investment-corp-fla-1973.