Meghreblian v. Meghreblian
This text of 402 N.E.2d 1077 (Meghreblian v. Meghreblian) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Massachusetts Appeals Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
A careful review of the judge’s awards in the light of his findings (including those as to the husband’s circumstances), the portions of the evidence reproduced in the appendix, and the various factors listed in G. L. c. 208, § 34 (as appearing in St. 1977, c. 467), leads to the conclusion that the judge abused his discretion (see Bianco v. Bianco, 371 Mass. 420, 423 [1976]; Rice v. Rice, 372 Mass. 398, 400, 401, 402 [1977]; Putnam v. Putnam, 5 Mass. App. Ct. 10, 15, 17 [1977], S.C., 7 Mass. App. Ct. 672 [1979]) in awarding the wife less (by some $4,500.00 a year) than the difference between the amount the wife can reasonably expect to earn from her employment and what the judge found to be the sum of her needs and those of the minor child. The fifth paragraph of both judgments is vacated, and the cases are remanded to the Probate Court for further proceedings; the wife is to have counsel fees and expenses of appeal.
So ordered.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
402 N.E.2d 1077, 9 Mass. App. Ct. 889, 1980 Mass. App. LEXIS 1099, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/meghreblian-v-meghreblian-massappct-1980.