Meek v. State

Indiana Supreme Court

Meek v. State

109 N.E.2d 908, 231 Ind. 706, 1953 Ind. LEXIS 164

CourtIndiana Supreme Court

DecidedJanuary 19, 1953

DocketNo. O-313

StatusPublished

This text of 109 N.E.2d 908 (Meek v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Indiana Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Meek v. State, 109 N.E.2d 908, 231 Ind. 706, 1953 Ind. LEXIS 164 (Ind. 1953).

Pincite

Opinion

Per Curiam.

The petitioner, appearing pro se, files what he designates as a petition for alternative writ of mandamus to compel certain action by the Dearborn Circuit Court.

The relief sought relates to a proceeding in an inferior court, but wholly fails to comply with any of the requirements of Rule 2-35.

The issuance of the writ is, therefore, denied. Cole v. Baker, Judge (1951), 230 Ind. 174, 101 N. E. 2d 925.

Note.—Reported in 109 N. E. 2d 908.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI