Meek v. State
109 N.E.2d 908, 231 Ind. 706, 1953 Ind. LEXIS 164
Opinion
The petitioner, appearing pro se, files what he designates as a petition for alternative writ of mandamus to compel certain action by the Dearborn Circuit Court.
The relief sought relates to a proceeding in an inferior court, but wholly fails to comply with any of the requirements of Rule 2-35.
The issuance of the writ is, therefore, denied. Cole v. Baker, Judge (1951), 230 Ind. 174, 101 N. E. 2d 925.
Note.—Reported in 109 N. E. 2d 908.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Meek v. State, 109 N.E.2d 908, 231 Ind. 706, 1953 Ind. LEXIS 164 (Ind. 1953).
109 N.E.2d 908 (Meek v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Cole v. Baker
101 N.E.2d 925 (Indiana Supreme Court, 1951)