Cole v. Baker

101 N.E.2d 925, 230 Ind. 174, 1951 Ind. LEXIS 226
CourtIndiana Supreme Court
DecidedDecember 6, 1951
Docket28,860
StatusPublished
Cited by4 cases

This text of 101 N.E.2d 925 (Cole v. Baker) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Indiana Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Cole v. Baker, 101 N.E.2d 925, 230 Ind. 174, 1951 Ind. LEXIS 226 (Ind. 1951).

Opinion

Per Curiam.—The

relator, appearing pro se., files what he designates as a verified petition for an alternative writ of mandate to compel certain action by the respondent judge.

The relief sought relates to a proceeding in an inferior court, but wholly fails to comply with the requirements of Rule 2-35.

. The issuance of the writ is denied.

Note.—Reported in 101 N. E. 2d 925.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

State ex rel. Gordon v. Boone Circuit Court
123 N.E.2d 705 (Indiana Supreme Court, 1955)
Johnson v. Murray
110 N.E.2d 745 (Indiana Supreme Court, 1953)
Meek v. State
109 N.E.2d 908 (Indiana Supreme Court, 1953)
American Telephone & Telegraph Co. v. Smyser
101 N.E.2d 925 (Indiana Court of Appeals, 1951)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
101 N.E.2d 925, 230 Ind. 174, 1951 Ind. LEXIS 226, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/cole-v-baker-ind-1951.