Meece v. OCC Construction Corp.
Opinions
SEVERANCE AND REINSTATEMENT ORDER
Appellants1 Margaret Meece and Patrick Meece have filed a Suggestion of Bankruptcy advising this Court that they filed a voluntary bankruptcy petition on September 3, 2008. Accordingly, this appeal has been suspended because of the automatic bankruptcy stay. See Tex. R.App. P. 8.2; 11 U.S.C.A. § 362(a). However, the stay is effective only as to Appellants Margaret Meece and Patrick Meece, and the remaining appellant, Margaret Hiebeler, cannot benefit from the stay. See In re Sw. Bell Tel. Co., 35 S.W.3d 602, 604 (Tex.2000); Ma-Stell, Inc. v. Anadarko E & P Co., No. 10-03-358-CV, 2005 WL 984785, at *1 (Tex.App.-Waco Apr. 27, 2005, order); Lisanti v. Dixon, 147 S.W.3d 638, 641-42 (Tex.App.-Dallas 2004, pet. denied), cert. denied, 549 U.S. 818, 127 S.Ct. 83, 166 L.Ed.2d 30 (2006).
Accordingly, we sever the appeals of Margaret Meece and Patrick Meece from the remainder of the appeal. See Tex. R.App. P. 8.3(b); Ma-SteO, 2005 WL 984785, at *1. The Clerk of this Court shall docket the appeal of Margaret Meece and Patrick Meece under cause number 10-08-00354-CV, styled Margaret Meece and Patrick Meece v. OCC Construction Corporation.
This appeal is reinstated, and the Clerk of this Court shall re-style this appeal as Margaret Hiebeler v. OCC Construction Corporation. See Mar-Stell, 2005 WL 984785, at *1.
Any time period allowed for action under the appellate rules that had begun to run and had not expired when this proceeding was suspended begins anew on the date of this order. See Tex.R.App. P. 8.2; Mar-Stell, 2005 WL 984785, at *1.
Chief Justice GRAY dissenting.
Footnotes
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
264 S.W.3d 928 (Meece v. OCC Construction Corp.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.