Meece v. OCC Construction Corp.

264 S.W.3d 928, 2008 Tex. App. LEXIS 7832, 2008 WL 4594343
CourtCourt of Appeals of Texas
DecidedOctober 15, 2008
Docket10-08-00329-CV, 10-08-00354-CV
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 264 S.W.3d 928 (Meece v. OCC Construction Corp.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Meece v. OCC Construction Corp., 264 S.W.3d 928, 2008 Tex. App. LEXIS 7832, 2008 WL 4594343 (Tex. Ct. App. 2008).

Opinions

SEVERANCE AND REINSTATEMENT ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Appellants1 Margaret Meece and Patrick Meece have filed a Suggestion of Bankruptcy advising this Court that they filed a voluntary bankruptcy petition on September 3, 2008. Accordingly, this appeal has been suspended because of the automatic bankruptcy stay. See Tex. R.App. P. 8.2; 11 U.S.C.A. § 362(a). However, the stay is effective only as to Appellants Margaret Meece and Patrick Meece, and the remaining appellant, Margaret Hiebeler, cannot benefit from the stay. See In re Sw. Bell Tel. Co., 35 S.W.3d 602, 604 (Tex.2000); Ma-Stell, Inc. v. Anadarko E & P Co., No. 10-03-358-CV, 2005 WL 984785, at *1 (Tex.App.-Waco Apr. 27, 2005, order); Lisanti v. Dixon, 147 S.W.3d 638, 641-42 (Tex.App.-Dallas 2004, pet. denied), cert. denied, 549 U.S. 818, 127 S.Ct. 83, 166 L.Ed.2d 30 (2006).

Accordingly, we sever the appeals of Margaret Meece and Patrick Meece from the remainder of the appeal. See Tex. R.App. P. 8.3(b); Ma-SteO, 2005 WL 984785, at *1. The Clerk of this Court shall docket the appeal of Margaret Meece and Patrick Meece under cause number 10-08-00354-CV, styled Margaret Meece and Patrick Meece v. OCC Construction Corporation.

This appeal is reinstated, and the Clerk of this Court shall re-style this appeal as Margaret Hiebeler v. OCC Construction Corporation. See Mar-Stell, 2005 WL 984785, at *1.

Any time period allowed for action under the appellate rules that had begun to run and had not expired when this proceeding was suspended begins anew on the date of this order. See Tex.R.App. P. 8.2; Mar-Stell, 2005 WL 984785, at *1.

Chief Justice GRAY dissenting.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Meece v. OCC Construction Corp.
264 S.W.3d 928 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 2008)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
264 S.W.3d 928, 2008 Tex. App. LEXIS 7832, 2008 WL 4594343, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/meece-v-occ-construction-corp-texapp-2008.