Medina v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Medina v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance

303 A.D.2d 989, 755 N.Y.S.2d 921, 2003 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 2879

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedMarch 21, 2003

DocketAppeal No. 2

StatusPublished

This text of 303 A.D.2d 989 (Medina v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Medina v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance, 303 A.D.2d 989, 755 N.Y.S.2d 921, 2003 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 2879 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2003).

Pincite

Opinion

—Appeal from an order of Supreme Court, Erie County (Mintz, J.), entered April 22, 2002, which granted defendant’s motion to reargue and, upon reargument, dismissed the third, fourth and fifth causes of action.

It is hereby ordered that the order so appealed from be and the same hereby is unanimously modified on the law by denying that part of defendant’s motion seeking summary judgment dismissing the third, fourth and fifth causes of action and reinstating those causes of action and as modified the order is affirmed without costs.

Same memorandum as in Medina v State Farm Mut. Auto. Ins. Co. (303 AD2d 987 [2003]). Present — Green, J.P., Wisner, Scudder, Burns and Gorski, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

—Appeal from an order of Supreme Court, Erie County (Mintz, J.), entered April 22, 2002, which granted defendant’s motion to reargue and, upon reargument, dismissed the third, fourth and fifth causes of action.

It is hereby ordered that the order so appealed from be and the same hereby is unanimously modified on the law by denying that part of defendant’s motion seeking summary judgment dismissing the third, fourth and fifth causes of action and reinstating those causes of action and as modified the order is affirmed without costs.

Same memorandum as in Medina v State Farm Mut. Auto. Ins. Co. (303 AD2d 987 [2003]). Present — Green, J.P., Wisner, Scudder, Burns and Gorski, JJ.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

303 A.D.2d 989, 755 N.Y.S.2d 921, 2003 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 2879, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/medina-v-state-farm-mutual-automobile-insurance-nyappdiv-2003.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack