Medina v. Senkowski

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Medina v. Senkowski

242 A.D.2d 762, 661 N.Y.S.2d 856, 1997 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 8538

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedSeptember 4, 1997

StatusPublished

Cited by3 cases

This text of 242 A.D.2d 762 (Medina v. Senkowski) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Medina v. Senkowski, 242 A.D.2d 762, 661 N.Y.S.2d 856, 1997 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 8538 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1997).

Pincite

Opinion

Appeal from a judgment of the Supreme Court (Lewis, J.), entered August 26, 1996 in Clinton County, which dismissed petitioner’s application for a writ of habeas corpus, in a proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 70, without a hearing.

Petitioner is currently incarcerated at Clinton Correctional Facility in Clinton County, serving a prison sentence of 15 years to life following his 1973 conviction of the crime of murder (see, People v Medina, 47 AD2d 717). Petitioner’s application for a writ of habeas corpus was properly dismissed by Supreme Court on the ground that the contention raised therein, i.e., that the documents committing him to prison in 1973 were deficient, could have been raised in the context of a direct appeal or a motion pursuant to CPL article 440 (see, People ex rel. Fisher v Leonardo, 200 AD2d 844, lv denied 83 NY2d 754). We note that because petitioner is not entitled to immediate release, habeas corpus is an inappropriate remedy (see, People ex rel. Kaplan v Commissioner of Correction of City of N. Y., 60 NY2d 648; People ex rel. Franza v Stinson, 228 AD2d 843, appeal dismissed 88 NY2d 1015).

Mikoll, J. P., Mercure, White, Yesawich Jr. and Peters, JJ., concur. Ordered that the judgment is affirmed, without costs.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Appeal from a judgment of the Supreme Court (Lewis, J.), entered August 26, 1996 in Clinton County, which dismissed petitioner’s application for a writ of habeas corpus, in a proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 70, without a hearing.

Petitioner is currently incarcerated at Clinton Correctional Facility in Clinton County, serving a prison sentence of 15 years to life following his 1973 conviction of the crime of murder (see, People v Medina, 47 AD2d 717). Petitioner’s application for a writ of habeas corpus was properly dismissed by Supreme Court on the ground that the contention raised therein, i.e., that the documents committing him to prison in 1973 were deficient, could have been raised in the context of a direct appeal or a motion pursuant to CPL article 440 (see, People ex rel. Fisher v Leonardo, 200 AD2d 844, lv denied 83 NY2d 754). We note that because petitioner is not entitled to immediate release, habeas corpus is an inappropriate remedy (see, People ex rel. Kaplan v Commissioner of Correction of City of N. Y., 60 NY2d 648; People ex rel. Franza v Stinson, 228 AD2d 843, appeal dismissed 88 NY2d 1015).

Mikoll, J. P., Mercure, White, Yesawich Jr. and Peters, JJ., concur. Ordered that the judgment is affirmed, without costs.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

242 A.D.2d 762, 661 N.Y.S.2d 856, 1997 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 8538, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/medina-v-senkowski-nyappdiv-1997.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack