Home/Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas/Medford v. State

Medford v. State

198 S.W. 1182, 1917 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 446, 1917 WL 120
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Medford v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 86 Tex. Crim. 237 →
Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas·Decided November 28, 1917·No. No. 4722·Published

Opinion

PRENDERGAST, J.

Appellant was convicted of burglary. The record shows the case was properly tried without even any claimed error in the trial, as there are no bills of exceptions and no complaint to the charge of the court. The evidence is full and complete, showing the commission of the offense as alleged. We see no necessity of reciting the testimony. The judgment is affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Medford v. State, 198 S.W. 1182, 1917 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 446, 1917 WL 120 (Tex. 1917).

198 S.W. 1182 (Medford v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.