Medford v. State
174 S.W. 607, 76 Tex. Crim. 250, 1915 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 349
Opinions
This record is before us without a statement of facts. Under an indictment charging assault with intent to murder appellant was convicted of aggravated assault. In the absence of statement of facts appellant’s assignment of error oh the refusal of the continuance can not be intelligently revised. The matters set forth in the motion for new trial are in the same condition. In order to intelligently review those matters the testimony would be necessary.
As the record is presented the judgment will be affirmed.
Affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Medford v. State, 174 S.W. 607, 76 Tex. Crim. 250, 1915 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 349 (Tex. 1915).
174 S.W. 607 (Medford v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.