Medera v. Donacien
This text of 2025 NY Slip Op 01213 (Medera v. Donacien) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
| Medera v Donacien |
| 2025 NY Slip Op 01213 |
| Decided on March 5, 2025 |
| Appellate Division, Second Department |
| Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431. |
| This opinion is uncorrected and subject to revision before publication in the Official Reports. |
Decided on March 5, 2025 SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK Appellate Division, Second Judicial Department
LARA J. GENOVESI, J.P.
LINDA CHRISTOPHER
DEBORAH A. DOWLING
LAURENCE L. LOVE, JJ.
2023-10858
(Index No. 701723/18)
v
Donald Donacien, defendant third-party plaintiff-appellant; Charles Amner, et al., third-party defendants.
James F. Butler, Jericho, NY (Marcella Gerbasi Crewe of counsel), for defendant third-party plaintiff-appellant.
Baker, McEvoy & Moskovits (Marjorie E. Bornes, Freeport, NY, of counsel), for third-party defendants.
DECISION & ORDER
In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, the defendant appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Pam B. Jackman Brown, J.), entered October 23, 2023. The order, insofar as appealed from, failed to determine the defendant's motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint on the ground that the plaintiff did not sustain a serious injury within the meaning of Insurance Law § 5102(d) as a result of the subject accident.
ORDERED that the appeal is dismissed, without costs or disbursements.
We do not reach the defendant's arguments regarding his motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint on the ground that the plaintiff did not sustain a serious injury within the meaning of Insurance Law § 5102(d) as a result of the subject accident. The motion was not addressed in the order appealed from and, therefore, remains pending and undecided (see Braithwaite v City of New York, 220 AD3d 834, 835; Katz v Katz, 68 AD2d 536, 543). Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal.
GENOVESI, J.P., CHRISTOPHER, DOWLING and LOVE, JJ., concur.
ENTER:Darrell M. Joseph
Clerk of the Court
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
2025 NY Slip Op 01213, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/medera-v-donacien-nyappdiv-2025.