Braithwaite v. City of New York

196 N.Y.S.3d 567, 220 A.D.3d 834, 2023 NY Slip Op 05244
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedOctober 18, 2023
DocketIndex No. 502803/18
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 196 N.Y.S.3d 567 (Braithwaite v. City of New York) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Braithwaite v. City of New York, 196 N.Y.S.3d 567, 220 A.D.3d 834, 2023 NY Slip Op 05244 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2023).

Opinion

Braithwaite v City of New York (2023 NY Slip Op 05244)
Braithwaite v City of New York
2023 NY Slip Op 05244
Decided on October 18, 2023
Appellate Division, Second Department
Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431.
This opinion is uncorrected and subject to revision before publication in the Official Reports.


Decided on October 18, 2023 SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK Appellate Division, Second Judicial Department
HECTOR D. LASALLE, P.J.
FRANCESCA E. CONNOLLY
LARA J. GENOVESI
HELEN VOUTSINAS, JJ.

2021-01651
(Index No. 502803/18)

[*1]Sandra Braithwaite, etc., respondent,

v

City of New York, defendant, New York City Transit Authority, et al., appellants.


Anna J. Ervolina, Brooklyn, NY (Timothy J. O'Shaughnessy of counsel), for appellants.



DECISION & ORDER

In an action, inter alia, to recover damages for wrongful death, the defendants New York City Transit Authority and Metropolitan Transit Authority appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Katherine A. Levine, J.), dated February 16, 2021. The order, insofar as appealed from, failed to determine those defendants' cross-motion pursuant to CPLR 3211(a) to dismiss the complaint insofar as asserted against them.

ORDERED that the appeal is dismissed, without costs or disbursements.

We do not reach the arguments of the defendants New York City Transit Authority and Metropolitan Transit Authority regarding their cross-motion pursuant to CPLR 3211(a) to dismiss the complaint insofar as asserted against them. The cross-motion was not addressed in the order appealed from and, therefore, remains pending and undecided (see Katz v Katz , 68 AD2d 536, 543). Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal.

LASALLE, P.J., CONNOLLY, GENOVESI and VOUTSINAS, JJ., concur.

ENTER:

Darrell M. Joseph

Acting Clerk of the Court



Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Medera v. Donacien
2025 NY Slip Op 01213 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2025)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
196 N.Y.S.3d 567, 220 A.D.3d 834, 2023 NY Slip Op 05244, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/braithwaite-v-city-of-new-york-nyappdiv-2023.