Mearns v. State

779 So. 2d 282, 1998 WL 1157190
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedAugust 26, 1998
Docket97-00474
StatusPublished
Cited by9 cases

This text of 779 So. 2d 282 (Mearns v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Mearns v. State, 779 So. 2d 282, 1998 WL 1157190 (Fla. Ct. App. 1998).

Opinion

779 So.2d 282 (1998)

Chris MEARNS, Appellant,
v.
STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 97-00474.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

August 26, 1998.

James Marion Moorman, Public Defender, and Joanna B. Conner, Assistant Public Defender, Bartow, for Appellant.

Robert A. Butterworth, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Tonya R. Vickers, Assistant Attorney General, Tampa, for Appellee.

*283 PER CURIAM.

Chris Mearns appeals the denial of his motion to withdraw his guilty pleas to numerous violations of probation ranging from failure to make restitution payments, to narcotics possession. After his probation was revoked and he was resentenced, Mearns sought to withdraw his pleas, arguing he was unaware that the trial court could impose a split sentence of incarceration followed by probation. This is not a legal basis for allowing Mearns to withdraw his plea, since after revoking Mearns' probation the court was free to impose any sentence it may have originally imposed before placing him on probation. We affirm the denial of the motion to withdraw pleas. See § 948.06(1), Fla. Stat. (1987); Williams v. State, 629 So.2d 174 (Fla. 2d DCA 1993).

We remand, however, to correct an error in Mearns' written sentence in circuit court case no. 94-927F. The trial court orally pronounced a sentence of sixty months' imprisonment with credit for time served. The sentencing documents in that case reflect a sentence of 113.4 months and must be corrected to conform with the court's oral pronouncement. See Matthews v. State, 578 So.2d 51 (Fla. 2d DCA 1991). All sentences imposed in the remaining cases are affirmed.

BLUE, A.C.J., QUINCE and CASANUEVA, JJ., Concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

DESMOND L. GRAHAM v. STATE OF FLORIDA
District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2018
ARTHUR A. GENOVESE, I I I v. STATE OF FLORIDA
District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2018
TRENTAIR LAVENT BINGHAM v. STATE OF FLORIDA
District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2018
Howard v. State
141 So. 3d 632 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2014)
Savage v. State
120 So. 3d 619 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2013)
Hill v. State
927 So. 2d 1047 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2006)
Williams v. State
889 So. 2d 969 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2004)
State v. Brown
855 So. 2d 270 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2003)
Troncoso v. State
825 So. 2d 494 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2002)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
779 So. 2d 282, 1998 WL 1157190, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/mearns-v-state-fladistctapp-1998.