Meadows v. J.C. Penney Corp.

Supreme Court of Louisiana

Meadows v. J.C. Penney Corp.

918 So. 2d 1021, 2006 La. LEXIS 17, 2006 WL 270055

Supreme Court of Louisiana·Decided January 9, 2006·No. No. 2005-CC-1703·Published

Opinion

In re J.C. Penney Corporation Inc. et al.; Dameron, Randy; — Defendant(s); Applying for Supervisory and/or Remedial Writs, Parish of Rapides, 9th Judicial District Court Div. C, No. 217,228; to the Court of Appeal, Third Circuit, No. CW 05-00152.

Not considered; not timely filed. See Sup.Ct. Rule X, Sect. 5(d) (“In all cases where the presumption [of timely filing] does not apply, the timeliness of the mailing shall be shown only by an official United States postmark or by official receipt or certificate from the United States Postal Service made at the time of mailing which indicates the date thereof.”) See also Sup. Ct. Rule X, Sect. 5(a) and Morris v. Stueben, 01-0137 (La.3/16/01), 781 So.2d 1220.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In re J.C. Penney Corporation Inc. et al.; Dameron, Randy; — Defendant(s); Applying for Supervisory and/or Remedial Writs, Parish of Rapides, 9th Judicial District Court Div. C, No. 217,228; to the Court of Appeal, Third Circuit, No. CW 05-00152.

Not considered; not timely filed. See Sup.Ct. Rule X, Sect. 5(d) (“In all cases where the presumption [of timely filing] does not apply, the timeliness of the mailing shall be shown only by an official United States postmark or by official receipt or certificate from the United States Postal Service made at the time of mailing which indicates the date thereof.”) See also Sup. Ct. Rule X, Sect. 5(a) and Morris v. Stueben, 01-0137 (La.3/16/01), 781 So.2d 1220.

Meadows v. J.C. Penney Corp., 918 So. 2d 1021, 2006 La. LEXIS 17, 2006 WL 270055 (La. 2006).

Pincite

918 So. 2d 1021 (Meadows v. J.C. Penney Corp.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related