Morris v. Stueben
This text of 781 So. 2d 1220 (Morris v. Stueben) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Louisiana primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Daniel T. MORRIS
v.
Roger E. STUEBEN, M.D., et al.
Supreme Court of Louisiana.
PER CURIAM.
The application for reconsideration is denied. Relator's original writ application in this court was filed on January 16, 2001, sixty-nine days after the court of appeal denied his writ application on November 8, 2000 and well outside of the thirty day period mandated by Supreme Court Rule X, § 5. Although relator's application in this court was filed within thirty days from the court of appeal's denial of rehearing, Supreme Court Rule X, § 5(a) extends the *1221 thirty day period for taking writs to this court only "in those instances where a rehearing is allowed" in the court of appeal. Uniform Court of Appeal Rules 4-9 and 2-18.7 do not provide for a rehearing from a denial of an application for supervisory writs. Accordingly, the delay for taking writs to this court ran from the court of appeal's original writ denial, not its denial of rehearing.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
781 So. 2d 1220, 2001 WL 83836, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/morris-v-stueben-la-2001.