Meadows v. Higgins

Supreme Court of Connecticut

Meadows v. Higgins

719 A.2d 904, 247 Conn. 910, 1998 Conn. LEXIS 361

Supreme Court of Connecticut·Decided September 15, 1998·No. SC 15997·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

The plaintiffs petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 49 Conn. App. 286 (AC 17533), is granted, limited to the following issue:

“Did the Appellate Court properly conclude that the Home Improvement Act, General Statutes § 20-418 et seq., applied to the transaction between the plaintiff and the defendants?”

[911] The Supreme Court docket number is SC 15997. Jerome A. Mayer, in support of the petition. William A. Phillips, in opposition. Decided September 15, 1998

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

The plaintiffs petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 49 Conn. App. 286 (AC 17533), is granted, limited to the following issue:

“Did the Appellate Court properly conclude that the Home Improvement Act, General Statutes § 20-418 et seq., applied to the transaction between the plaintiff and the defendants?”

[911] The Supreme Court docket number is SC 15997. Jerome A. Mayer, in support of the petition. William A. Phillips, in opposition. Decided September 15, 1998

Meadows v. Higgins, 719 A.2d 904, 247 Conn. 910, 1998 Conn. LEXIS 361 (Colo. 1998).

Pincite

719 A.2d 904 (Meadows v. Higgins) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related