Meadows v. Higgins

Supreme Court of Connecticut

Meadows v. Higgins

719 A.2d 904, 247 Conn. 910, 1998 Conn. LEXIS 361

CourtSupreme Court of Connecticut

DecidedSeptember 15, 1998

DocketSC 15997

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 719 A.2d 904 (Meadows v. Higgins) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Connecticut primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Meadows v. Higgins, 719 A.2d 904, 247 Conn. 910, 1998 Conn. LEXIS 361 (Colo. 1998).

Pincite

Opinion

The plaintiffs petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 49 Conn. App. 286 (AC 17533), is granted, limited to the following issue:

“Did the Appellate Court properly conclude that the Home Improvement Act, General Statutes § 20-418 et seq., applied to the transaction between the plaintiff and the defendants?”

[911]*911The Supreme Court docket number is SC 15997. Jerome A. Mayer, in support of the petition. William A. Phillips, in opposition. Decided September 15, 1998

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

The plaintiffs petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 49 Conn. App. 286 (AC 17533), is granted, limited to the following issue:

“Did the Appellate Court properly conclude that the Home Improvement Act, General Statutes § 20-418 et seq., applied to the transaction between the plaintiff and the defendants?”

[911]*911The Supreme Court docket number is SC 15997. Jerome A. Mayer, in support of the petition. William A. Phillips, in opposition. Decided September 15, 1998

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

719 A.2d 904, 247 Conn. 910, 1998 Conn. LEXIS 361, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/meadows-v-higgins-conn-1998.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack