Meader Atlas Co. v. Buhl
143 A. 536, 103 N.J.L. 702, 18 Gummere 702, 1927 N.J. LEXIS 257
Opinion
The judgment under review herein should be affirmed, for the reasons expressed in the opinion delivered per curiam,' in the Supreme Court.
For affirmance — The Chancellor, Chief Justice, Trenchard, Kalisch, Katzenbach, Lloyd, Van Buskirk, McGlennon, Kays, Hetfield, Dear, JJ. 10.
For reversal — Kone.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Meader Atlas Co. v. Buhl, 143 A. 536, 103 N.J.L. 702, 18 Gummere 702, 1927 N.J. LEXIS 257 (N.J. 1927).
143 A. 536 (Meader Atlas Co. v. Buhl) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
State v. Mauti
3 A.3d 624 (New Jersey Superior Court App Division, 2010)
In re Contest of the Election of Ray
56 A.2d 761 (New Jersey Circuit Court, 1947)
Chase v. Lujan
149 P.2d 1003 (New Mexico Supreme Court, 1944)
Richardson v. Radics
35 A.2d 425 (New Jersey Circuit Court, 1943)
Glenmore Distilleries Co. v. Fast Trucking, Inc.
184 A. 198 (New Jersey Circuit Court, 1936)
Union Republican Party v. Terry
49 P.R. 268 (Supreme Court of Puerto Rico, 1935)
El Partido Unión Republicana y El Partido Socialista de Puerto Rico v. Terry
49 P.R. Dec. 277 (Supreme Court of Puerto Rico, 1935)