Meacham v. Noonan Construction Co.

260 So. 2d 235, 1972 Fla. App. LEXIS 6935
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided March 23, 1972·No. No. O-488·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

This appeal challenges the correctness of a final summary judgment rendered in favor of appellees.

A careful examination of the record on appeal conclusively establishes the absence of any genuine triable issue of a material fact with respect to appellees’ liability for the damages suffered by appellants, and that appellees were entitled to judgment as a matter of law. The judgment appealed is accordingly affirmed. 23 Fla.Jur. 281, Negligence, § 37; DeLuca v. Manchester Laundry & Dry Cleaning Company (1955) 380 Pa. 484, 112 A.2d 372; Kite v. Jones (1957) 389 Pa. 339, 132 A.2d 683; Cotter v. Bell (1965) 417 Pa. 560, 208 A.2d 216; Tuz v. Burmeister (Fla.App.1971) 254 So.2d 569; General Telephone Company of Florida, Inc. v. Mahr (Fla.App.1963) 153 So.2d 13.

SPECTOR, C. J., and WIGGINTON and JOHNSON, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Meacham v. Noonan Construction Co., 260 So. 2d 235, 1972 Fla. App. LEXIS 6935 (Fla. Ct. App. 1972).

260 So. 2d 235 (Meacham v. Noonan Construction Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Savage v. Bell
274 So. 2d 9 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1973)