M.D.J. v. State
936 So. 2d 774, 2006 Fla. App. LEXIS 14620
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided September 1, 2006·No. No. 5D05-3330·Published·Cited by 4 cases
Opinion
We strike the assessment of the fine set forth in section 939.185, Florida Statutes (2005), as it has no application in juvenile proceedings. See V.K.E. v. State, 934 So.2d 1276 (Fla. 2006). We affirm the trial court’s order denying suppression of M.D.J.’s statement to law enforcement as we agree that M.D.J. was not the subject of a custodial interrogation.
AFFIRMED; FINE STRICKEN.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
M.D.J. v. State, 936 So. 2d 774, 2006 Fla. App. LEXIS 14620 (Fla. Ct. App. 2006).
936 So. 2d 774 (M.D.J. v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
S.F. v. State
56 So. 3d 116 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2011)
T.L.S. v. State
949 So. 2d 290 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2007)
MDJ v. State
936 So. 2d 774 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2006)