McTaggart & Sons v. White

136 N.W.2d 296, 257 Iowa 1168, 1965 Iowa Sup. LEXIS 670
CourtSupreme Court of Iowa
DecidedJune 30, 1965
DocketNo. 51753
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 136 N.W.2d 296 (McTaggart & Sons v. White) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Iowa primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
McTaggart & Sons v. White, 136 N.W.2d 296, 257 Iowa 1168, 1965 Iowa Sup. LEXIS 670 (iowa 1965).

Opinion

■ Thompson, J. — _

This case cannot be factually distinguished from Anderson v. National By-Products, Inc., 257 Iowa 921, 135 N.W.2d 602. The rule of stare decisis et non quieta movere requires an affirmance.

We find merit in the appellants’ motion to assess, a part [1169]*1169of the costs of printing the record against '-the" appellee." The record is unnecessarily long. "We find much immaterial matter was inserted at the demand of the appellee. One half of the cost of the printed record will be taxed against the plaintiff-appellee. All remaining costs will be taxed against the defendants-appellants. The case is in all- other respects affirmed-. — Affirmed.

All JustiCES concur except LARSON, J.; who dissents.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
136 N.W.2d 296, 257 Iowa 1168, 1965 Iowa Sup. LEXIS 670, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/mctaggart-sons-v-white-iowa-1965.