McTaggart & Sons v. White
This text of 136 N.W.2d 296 (McTaggart & Sons v. White) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Iowa primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
This case cannot be factually distinguished from Anderson v. National By-Products, Inc., 257 Iowa 921, 135 N.W.2d 602. The rule of stare decisis et non quieta movere requires an affirmance.
We find merit in the appellants’ motion to assess, a part [1169]*1169of the costs of printing the record against '-the" appellee." The record is unnecessarily long. "We find much immaterial matter was inserted at the demand of the appellee. One half of the cost of the printed record will be taxed against the plaintiff-appellee. All remaining costs will be taxed against the defendants-appellants. The case is in all- other respects affirmed-. — Affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
136 N.W.2d 296, 257 Iowa 1168, 1965 Iowa Sup. LEXIS 670, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/mctaggart-sons-v-white-iowa-1965.