McSween v. State Live Stock Sanitary Board

125 So. 704, 97 Fla. 749
CourtSupreme Court of Florida
DecidedApril 18, 1927
StatusPublished
Cited by18 cases

This text of 125 So. 704 (McSween v. State Live Stock Sanitary Board) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
McSween v. State Live Stock Sanitary Board, 125 So. 704, 97 Fla. 749 (Fla. 1927).

Opinion

Per Curiam.

Complainants allege that they are the owners of in excess of 75% of all the cattle within zone No. 14 under Chap. 9201, Acts of 1923; that said Chapter and portions thereof are invalid and that action taken thereunder by the State Live Stock Sanitary Board with reference to zone No. 14 is illegal. It is prayed that the Board be enjoined from enforcing any of the rules and regulations or provisions of Chapter 9201 in any part of zone No. 14, &c. The court denied a temporary injunction and complainants appealed. As the complainants do not allege that they own or control all the cattle in zone No. 14, the prayer for injunction is broader than complainants’ right and was properly denied.

Affirmed.

Ellis, C. J., and Whitfield, Terrell, Strum, and Brown, J. J., concur. Buford, J., disqualified.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Head v. Platte County, Mo.
749 P.2d 6 (Supreme Court of Kansas, 1988)
Tropical Park, Inc. v. DEPT. OF BUS. REG.
433 So. 2d 1329 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1983)
State Ex Rel. Eli Lilly & Co. v. Hon. Carl R. Gaertner
619 S.W.2d 761 (Missouri Court of Appeals, 1981)
Department of Administration v. Horne
269 So. 2d 659 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1972)
Baillie v. Walker
30 Fla. Supp. 113 (Miami-Dade County Circuit Court, 1968)
American National Bank & Trust Co. v. Hon
360 S.W.2d 20 (Tennessee Supreme Court, 1962)
Florida Livestock Board v. Gladden
76 So. 2d 291 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1954)
Coulter v. Reese
75 So. 2d 608 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 1954)
Conard v. State
16 A.2d 121 (Superior Court of Delaware, 1940)
de la Vega v. Sancho Bonet
56 P.R. 722 (Supreme Court of Puerto Rico, 1940)
State Ex Rel. Perkins v. Lee
194 So. 315 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1940)
Winter v. Mack
194 So. 225 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1940)
Dowling v. W. R. Hodges & Son
179 So. 702 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1938)
Utley v. City of St. Petersburg
149 So. 806 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1933)
Blitch v. Buchanan
131 So. 151 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1930)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
125 So. 704, 97 Fla. 749, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/mcsween-v-state-live-stock-sanitary-board-fla-1927.