McQueen v. Brown
814 A.2d 1042, 175 N.J. 200, 2002 N.J. LEXIS 1305
Opinion
The judgment is affirmed, substantially for the reasons expressed in Judge Eichen’s opinion of the Appellate Division, reported at 342 N.J.Super. 120, 775 A.2d 748 (2001).
Opposed — None.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
McQueen v. Brown, 814 A.2d 1042, 175 N.J. 200, 2002 N.J. LEXIS 1305 (N.J. 2002).
814 A.2d 1042 (McQueen v. Brown) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Sebastian Rojas-Gomez v. James Tyliczka
New Jersey Superior Court App Division, 2025
PAUL MASLOW VS. RICHARD DONATO(L-0162-16, ATLANTIC COUNTY AND STATEWIDE)
New Jersey Superior Court App Division, 2017
Anna Mae Cashin v. Marisela Bello(073215)
123 A.3d 1042 (Supreme Court of New Jersey, 2015)
Girls Friendly Society v. Cape May City
26 N.J. Tax 549 (New Jersey Tax Court, 2012)
Henry v. New Jersey Department of Human Services
9 A.3d 882 (Supreme Court of New Jersey, 2010)
Township of Pemberton v. Berardi
876 A.2d 287 (New Jersey Superior Court App Division, 2005)
Ivy Hill Park v. Abutidze
852 A.2d 217 (New Jersey Superior Court App Division, 2004)
Disabilities Resource Center v. Somers Pt.
851 A.2d 792 (New Jersey Superior Court App Division, 2004)
Miah v. Ahmed
846 A.2d 1244 (Supreme Court of New Jersey, 2004)
Miah v. Ahmed
819 A.2d 440 (New Jersey Superior Court App Division, 2003)