McQuade v. Holroyd

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in McQuade v. Holroyd. Read the opinion of the Court — 2017 Fla. App. LEXIS 1259
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided January 30, 2017·No. 5D16-3009·Published

Opinion

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA FIFTH DISTRICT

NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND DISPOSITION THEREOF IF FILED

DANA LYNN MCQUADE,

Appellant,

v. Case No. 5D16-3009

LANDON BRUCE HOLROYD,

Appellee.

________________________________/

Opinion filed February 3, 2017

Appeal from the Circuit Court for Orange County, Heather Pinder Rodriguez, Judge.

Jennifer A. Englert, of The Orlando Law Group, P.L., Orlando, for Appellant.

Hal Roen, of Hal Roen, P.A., Maitland, for Appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Because we do not have a transcript of the proceedings below, we cannot resolve

the underlying factual issues in order to determine whether the trial court's judgment on

the issue of child support is without evidentiary support. See Applegate v. Barnett Bank

of Tallahassee, 377 So. 2d 1150, 1152 (Fla. 1979). In the absence of a transcript, we will

only reverse where the error appears on the face of the judgment. See Monacelli v. Gonzalez, 883 So. 2d 361, 362 (Fla. 4th DCA 2004); Hoirup v. Hoirup, 862 So. 2d 780,

782 (Fla. 2d DCA 2003). Appellant has made no such showing in this case.

AFFIRMED.

COHEN, C.J., PALMER and ORFINGER, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

McQuade v. Holroyd, (Fla. Ct. App. 2017).

McQuade v. Holroyd (McQuade v. Holroyd) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Applegate v. Barnett Bank of Tallahassee
377 So. 2d 1150 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1979)
Hoirup v. Hoirup
862 So. 2d 780 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2003)
Monacelli v. Gonzalez
883 So. 2d 361 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2004)