McQuade v. Holroyd

208 So. 3d 848, 2017 WL 456910, 2017 Fla. App. LEXIS 1259
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided February 3, 2017·No. Case No. 5D16-3009·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Because we do not have a transcript of the proceedings below, we cannot resolve the underlying factual issues in order to determine whether the trial court’s judgment on the issue of child support is without evidentiary support. See Applegate v. Barnett Bank of Tallahassee, 377 So.2d 1150, 1152 (Fla. 1979). In the absence of a transcript, we will only reverse where the error appears on the face of the judgment. See Monacelli v. Gonzalez, 883 So.2d 361, 362 (Fla. 4th DCA 2004); Hoirup v. Hoirup, 862 So.2d 780, 782 (Fla. 2d DCA 2003). Appellant has made no such showing in this case.

AFFIRMED.

COHEN, C.J., PALMER and ORFINGER, JJ,, concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

McQuade v. Holroyd, 208 So. 3d 848, 2017 WL 456910, 2017 Fla. App. LEXIS 1259 (Fla. Ct. App. 2017).

208 So. 3d 848 (McQuade v. Holroyd) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Pitcher v. Schneider
236 So. 3d 1195 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2018)