McPherson v. Bittner
This text of 126 So. 3d 1230 (McPherson v. Bittner) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinions
Appellant challenges the award of fees in this modification of child support case. He appealed the award in the trial court, which we affirmed. McPherson v. Bittner, 88 So.3d 955 (Fla. 4th DCA 2000). We awarded appellate fees, thus determining entitlement. He now appeals the trial court’s fee award, claiming a lack of entitlement. He is bound by the law of the case, as appellee’s entitlement to attorney’s fees was already determined in the prior appeal. Dicks ex rel. Montgomery v. [1231]*1231Jenne, 740 So.2d 576, 578 (Fla. 4th DCA 1999) (law of the case doctrine prevents an appellate court from reconsidering questions of law considered by a previous appellate panel, unless there has been a material change in the evidence, controlling law has changed, or adhering to the prior decision would result in a manifest injustice).
Affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
126 So. 3d 1230, 2012 WL 5232293, 2012 Fla. App. LEXIS 18499, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/mcpherson-v-bittner-fladistctapp-2012.