McNerlin v. Denno

378 U.S. 575, 84 S. Ct. 1933, 12 L. Ed. 2d 1041, 1964 U.S. LEXIS 862
CourtSupreme Court of the United States
DecidedJune 22, 1964
Docket1117, Misc
StatusPublished
Cited by53 cases

This text of 378 U.S. 575 (McNerlin v. Denno) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of the United States primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
McNerlin v. Denno, 378 U.S. 575, 84 S. Ct. 1933, 12 L. Ed. 2d 1041, 1964 U.S. LEXIS 862 (1964).

Opinion

378 U.S. 575 (1964)

McNERLIN
v.
DENNO, WARDEN.

No. 1117, Misc.

Supreme Court of United States.

Decided June 22, 1964.
ON PETITION FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARI TO THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SECOND CIRCUIT.

Richard J. Medalie for petitioner.

Louis J. Lefkowitz, Attorney General of New York, Samuel A. Hirshowitz, First Assistant Attorney General, and Ronald J. Offenkrantz, Assistant Attorney General, for respondent.

PER CURIAM.

The motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis and the petition for a writ of certiorari are granted. The judgment of the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit is vacated and the case is remanded for further proceedings in conformity with the opinion of this Court in Jackson v. Denno, ante, p. 368.

MR. JUSTICE BLACK, MR. JUSTICE CLARK, MR. JUSTICE HARLAN and MR. JUSTICE STEWART dissent for the reasons stated in their dissenting opinions in Jackson v. Denno, supra.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Edwards v. Vannoy
593 U.S. 255 (Supreme Court, 2021)
In re Thomas
California Court of Appeal, 2018
In re Melvin Hiram Thomas II On Habeas Corpus
241 Cal. Rptr. 3d 864 (California Court of Appeals, 5th District, 2018)
State v. Knudsen
500 N.W.2d 84 (Court of Appeals of Iowa, 1993)
People v. Germany
674 P.2d 345 (Supreme Court of Colorado, 1983)
State v. Rivens
261 S.E.2d 867 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1980)
State v. Hutchinson
349 So. 2d 1252 (Supreme Court of Louisiana, 1977)
United States v. Lenardo
420 F. Supp. 1148 (D. New Jersey, 1976)
Schlomann v. Moseley
457 F.2d 1223 (Tenth Circuit, 1972)
People v. Superior Court
11 Cal. App. 3d 887 (California Court of Appeal, 1970)
Leslie F. Woodard v. United States
429 F.2d 716 (D.C. Circuit, 1970)
United States v. Kelly
314 F. Supp. 500 (E.D. New York, 1970)
In re Arlexe " S "
63 Misc. 2d 253 (NYC Family Court, 1970)
State v. Ussery
452 S.W.2d 146 (Supreme Court of Missouri, 1970)
United States v. Phillip Andrew Scott
425 F.2d 55 (Ninth Circuit, 1970)
United States v. Sorenson
308 F. Supp. 1268 (E.D. New York, 1970)
People v. McGrew
462 P.2d 1 (California Supreme Court, 1969)
Barnes v. State
461 P.2d 782 (Supreme Court of Kansas, 1969)
United States ex rel. Allison v. New Jersey
418 F.2d 332 (Third Circuit, 1969)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
378 U.S. 575, 84 S. Ct. 1933, 12 L. Ed. 2d 1041, 1964 U.S. LEXIS 862, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/mcnerlin-v-denno-scotus-1964.