McNeill v. Parker

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 05-6046

JAMES C. MCNEILL,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

versus

TERRILL PARKER; ROBERT D. FOUNTAIN; EVELINE FAULK, R.N.; GEORGE E. CURRIE; WILLIAM FEARNS; LINWOOD DUNSTON,

Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. Malcolm J. Howard, District Judge. (CA-04-691-5-CT-H)

Submitted: May 18, 2005 Decided: July 11, 2005

Before MICHAEL, KING, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

James C. McNeill, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c). PER CURIAM:

James C. McNeill appeals the district court’s order

denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) complaint under 28

U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B) (2000). We have reviewed the record and

find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning

of the district court. See McNeill v. Parker, No. CA-04-691-5-CT-H

(E.D.N.C. Nov. 8, 2004). We dispense with oral argument because

the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the

materials before the court and argument would not aid the

decisional process.

AFFIRMED

- 2 -