McNeill v. Parker

Fourth Circuit

McNeill v. Parker

138 F. App'x 568

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided July 11, 2005·No. No. 05-6046·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

James C. McNeill appeals the district corut’s order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) complaint under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B) (2000). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. See McNeill v. Parker, No. CA-04-691-5-CT-H (E.D.N.C. Nov. 8, 2004). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM:

James C. McNeill appeals the district corut’s order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) complaint under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B) (2000). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. See McNeill v. Parker, No. CA-04-691-5-CT-H (E.D.N.C. Nov. 8, 2004). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

McNeill v. Parker, 138 F. App'x 568 (4th Cir. 2005).

Pincite

138 F. App'x 568 (McNeill v. Parker) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related