McNeil v. Director, Patuxent Institution

404 U.S. 1057

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in McNeil v. Director, Patuxent Institution. Read the opinion of the Court — 407 U.S. 245 →

Supreme Court of the United States·Decided January 24, 1972·No. No. 71-5144·Published

Opinion

Ct. Sp. App. Md. [Certiorari granted, ante, p. 999.] Motion of petitioner for appointment of counsel granted. It is ordered that E. Barrett' Prettyman, Jr., Esquire, of Washington, D. C., a member of the Bar of this Court, be, and he is hereby, appointed to serve as counsel for petitioner in this case.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

McNeil v. Director, Patuxent Institution, 404 U.S. 1057 (1972).

Pincite

404 U.S. 1057 (McNeil v. Director, Patuxent Institution) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.