McNeil v. Council for Secular Humanism, Inc.

41 So. 3d 215, 2010 Fla. LEXIS 1114, 2010 WL 2682316
Supreme Court of Florida·Decided July 8, 2010·No. SC10-957·Published·Cited by 4 cases

Opinions

This cause having heretofore been submitted to the Court on Certified Great [216]*216Public Importance pursuant to Article V, Section 3(b), Florida Constitution (1980), and Florida Rule of Appellate Procedure 9.0S0(a)(2)(A)(v), and the Court having determined that it should decline to exercise jurisdiction, it is ordered that the Petition for Review is denied.

No Motion for Rehearing will be entertained by the Court. See Fla. RApp. P. 9.330(d)(2).

PARIENTE, QUINCE, POLSTON, LABARGA, and PERRY, JJ., concur. POLSTON, J., concurs with an opinion.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

McNeil v. Council for Secular Humanism, Inc., 41 So. 3d 215, 2010 Fla. LEXIS 1114, 2010 WL 2682316 (Fla. 2010).

41 So. 3d 215 (McNeil v. Council for Secular Humanism, Inc.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Atheists of Florida, Inc. v. City of Lakeland, Florida
713 F.3d 577 (Eleventh Circuit, 2013)
Atheists of Florida, Inc. v. City of Lakeland
838 F. Supp. 2d 1293 (M.D. Florida, 2012)
ATHEISTS OF FLORIDA v. City of Lakeland, Fla.
779 F. Supp. 2d 1330 (M.D. Florida, 2011)
McNeil v. Council for Secular Humanism, Inc.
41 So. 3d 215 (Supreme Court of Florida, 2010)