McNeely v. Hyde

46 La. Ann. 1083
CourtSupreme Court of Louisiana
DecidedMay 15, 1894
DocketNo. 11,459
StatusPublished
Cited by15 cases

This text of 46 La. Ann. 1083 (McNeely v. Hyde) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Louisiana primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
McNeely v. Hyde, 46 La. Ann. 1083 (La. 1894).

Opinions

On Motion to Dismiss Appeal.

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Watkins, J.

Plaintiff and appellee jshows to the court that the amount in dispute is below the lower limit of its jurisdiction, and for that reason the appeal should be dismissed.

The demand of the petition — and the prayer is to a like effect — is for the recovery of a tract of land valued at twelve hundred dollars, for the value of timber cut and removed, two hundred dollars, and for the rental value of the cleared land at the rate of two hundred and fifty dollars per annum, from 1889 to the date suit was instituted, August 18, 1892.

[1088]*1088A simple calculation shows that the amount in dispute is something-over two thousand dollars and consequently this court has appellate jurisdiction.

The motion is, therefore, overruled.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

McNeal v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Ins. Co.
278 So. 2d 108 (Supreme Court of Louisiana, 1973)
Stevens v. New Orleans and Northeastern Railroad Co.
341 F. Supp. 497 (E.D. Louisiana, 1972)
Lawrence v. Boudreau
9 So. 2d 224 (Supreme Court of Louisiana, 1942)
BOARD OF COM'RS FOR BURAS LEVEE DIST. v. Cockrell
91 F.2d 412 (Fifth Circuit, 1937)
Williams v. Hughes
169 So. 240 (Louisiana Court of Appeal, 1936)
Buillard v. Davis
169 So. 78 (Supreme Court of Louisiana, 1936)
Succession of Waterman, Sr.
165 So. 182 (Supreme Court of Louisiana, 1935)
Clark v. Norred
4 La. App. 394 (Louisiana Court of Appeal, 1926)
City of Shreveport v. Dickason
107 So. 427 (Supreme Court of Louisiana, 1926)
Knox v. Louisiana Ry. & Nav. Co.
102 So. 685 (Supreme Court of Louisiana, 1925)
Wilkinson v. MacHeca
103 So. 733 (Supreme Court of Louisiana, 1924)
Slattery v. Arkansas Natural Gas Co.
70 So. 806 (Supreme Court of Louisiana, 1916)
City of Detroit v. Village of Highland Park
152 N.W. 1002 (Michigan Supreme Court, 1915)
Amos Kent Lumber & Brick Co. v. Payne & Joubert
44 So. 728 (Supreme Court of Louisiana, 1907)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
46 La. Ann. 1083, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/mcneely-v-hyde-la-1894.