McNair v. Commissioner

26 T.C. 1221, 1956 U.S. Tax Ct. LEXIS 76
CourtUnited States Tax Court
DecidedSeptember 28, 1956
DocketDocket Nos. 57691, 59149
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 26 T.C. 1221 (McNair v. Commissioner) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering United States Tax Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
McNair v. Commissioner, 26 T.C. 1221, 1956 U.S. Tax Ct. LEXIS 76 (tax 1956).

Opinion

OPINION.

Withey, Judge:

Resolution of the issue here presented is dependent on statutory provision, not equity principles as urged in part by petitioner. We are justified in assuming that Congress has enacted applicable legislation with due consideration to the equities involved herein.

Section 22 (b) (5) of the Internal Revenue Code of 19391 permits the exclusion from gross taxable income of pay allowances to members of the armed services where such allowances are based upon sickness or personal injuries arising from active service in the armed services. No provision is made for the exclusion of allowances to such members where the allowance is based upon length of service. There is no claim here but that petitioner’s allowance is and always has been computed at 2½ per cent times his BO years of service times the pay of a commander, the rank held by him at retirement and also the rank held by him upon his recall to active service.

Nor is there any dispute that he was placed upon the retired list and paid an allowance under the Act of March 3,1931, 46 Stat. 1483, for reasons other than physical disability. The record does not disclose that his retirement status has been altered in any way since its genesis June 30, 1931. That he may or may not actually be entitled to now be retired for physical disability and to receive an allowance based thereon is not material here and that issue is not before us. We must view the situation as it is. It necessarily follows from the foregoing that petitioner’s retired pay allowances for the years here at issue are not excludible from gross taxable income under section 22 (b) (5). Marshall Sherman Scarce, 17 T. C. 830; Joseph B. Simms, 17 T. C. 1, affd. 196 F. 2d 238; and Elmer D. Pangburn, 13 T. C. 169.

In making our decision herein we are not unmindful of Prince v. United States, (Ct. Cl., 1954) 119 F. Supp. 238, wherein the Court of Claims on facts similar to but distinguishable from the facts with which we are here concerned held retired pay allowances exempt from Federal taxation under section 22 (b) (5). The crucial factual distinction is that in Prince the taxpayer, although retired for age and thereafter recalled to active duty in the armed services, did appear before the appropriate retirement board, which board made a finding that he (Prince) could have been originally retired for disability. In the instant case, petitioner did not appear before the retirement board and at the time of his original retirement obviously was not entitled to a disability retirement. Whether or not the factual differences noted constitute a distinction we respectfully decline to follow the Court of Claims in Prince and adhere to the principles enunciated in Marshall Sherman Scarce, Joseph B. Simms, and Elmer D. Pangburn, supra.

Decisions will be entered imder Bule 50.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

McNair v. Commissioner
26 T.C. 1221 (U.S. Tax Court, 1956)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
26 T.C. 1221, 1956 U.S. Tax Ct. LEXIS 76, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/mcnair-v-commissioner-tax-1956.