McMullin v. Bodine

93 A. 321, 247 Pa. 151, 1915 Pa. LEXIS 799
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania·Decided January 2, 1915·No. Appeal, No. 91·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

Per Curiam,

A majority of the court are of opinion that the construction by Judge Evans of the contract on which the suit is based is correct and that the decree appealed from should be affirmed for the reasons stated in his opinion.

Decree affirmed at the cost of the appellants.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

McMullin v. Bodine, 93 A. 321, 247 Pa. 151, 1915 Pa. LEXIS 799 (Pa. 1915).

93 A. 321 (McMullin v. Bodine) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Lincoln Rug Co. v. East Newark Realty
61 A.2d 448 (Supreme Court of New Jersey, 1948)