McMullan v. State

179 S.W.3d 905, 2005 Mo. App. LEXIS 1936, 2005 WL 3527657
Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided December 27, 2005·No. ED 85948·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Alfred R. McMullan (“Movant”) appeals from the motion court’s judgment denying his Rule 29.15 post-conviction motion after an evidentiary hearing. Movant was convicted of second degree murder, Section 565.021 RSMo 2000. Movant was sentenced to thirty years’ imprisonment. We affirm.

We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and find the motion court’s decision was not clearly erroneous. Helmig v. State, 42 S.W.3d 658, 665-66 (Mo.App.E.D.2001). An extended opinion would have no precedential value. We have furnished the parties with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the reasons for our decision.

We affirm the award pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

McMullan v. State, 179 S.W.3d 905, 2005 Mo. App. LEXIS 1936, 2005 WL 3527657 (Mo. Ct. App. 2005).

179 S.W.3d 905 (McMullan v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

McMullan v. Roper
599 F.3d 849 (Eighth Circuit, 2010)
BELPULSI v. Charles Schmitt & Co.
179 S.W.3d 905 (Missouri Court of Appeals, 2005)