McMullan v. State
This text of 179 S.W.3d 905 (McMullan v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Missouri Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
ORDER
Alfred R. McMullan (“Movant”) appeals from the motion court’s judgment denying his Rule 29.15 post-conviction motion after an evidentiary hearing. Movant was convicted of second degree murder, Section 565.021 RSMo 2000. Movant was sentenced to thirty years’ imprisonment. We affirm.
We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and find the motion court’s decision was not clearly erroneous. Helmig v. State, 42 S.W.3d 658, 665-66 (Mo.App.E.D.2001). An extended opinion would have no precedential value. We have furnished the parties with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the reasons for our decision.
We affirm the award pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
179 S.W.3d 905, 2005 Mo. App. LEXIS 1936, 2005 WL 3527657, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/mcmullan-v-state-moctapp-2005.