BELPULSI v. Charles Schmitt & Co.

179 S.W.3d 905, 2005 Mo. App. LEXIS 1932, 2005 WL 3527666
Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided December 27, 2005·No. ED 85976·Published

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Appellant, Dolores Belpulsi (“Claimant”), appeals from the decision of the Labor and Industrial Relations Commission (“the Commission”) in favor of Respondents, Charles Schmitt & Company (“Employer”) and Division of Employment Security (“the Division”). The Commission adopted the decision of the Division’s appeals tribunal affirming a deputy’s determination that Claimant is not entitled to unemployment benefits because she voluntarily quit her job with Employer without good cause attributable to her work or Employer. We affirm.

We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal. As an extended opinion would serve no jurisprudential purpose, we affirm the Commission’s decision pursuant to Rule 84.16(b). We have, however, provided a memorandum opinion for the use of the parties only setting forth the reasons for our decision.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

BELPULSI v. Charles Schmitt & Co., 179 S.W.3d 905, 2005 Mo. App. LEXIS 1932, 2005 WL 3527666 (Mo. Ct. App. 2005).

179 S.W.3d 905 (BELPULSI v. Charles Schmitt & Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

McMullan v. State
179 S.W.3d 905 (Missouri Court of Appeals, 2005)