McMenamin v. Tartaglione
590 A.2d 753, 527 Pa. 286
Opinion
John J. McMENAMIN, Petitioner,
v.
Margaret M. TARTAGLIONE, et al.
Ronald D. Castille, Intervenor.
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania.
Arthur R. Shuman, Philadelphia, for petitioner.
Louis W. Fryman, Philadelphia, for respondents.
Before NIX, C.J., and LARSEN, FLAHERTY, McDERMOTT, ZAPPALA, PAPADAKOS and CAPPY, JJ.
ORDER
PER CURIAM:
Order of Commonwealth Court, 139 Pa.Cmwlth. 269, 590 A.2d 802, affirmed. Opinion to follow.
LARSEN and PAPADAKOS, JJ., dissent.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
McMenamin v. Tartaglione, 590 A.2d 753, 527 Pa. 286 (Pa. 1991).
590 A.2d 753 (McMenamin v. Tartaglione) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
EQT CHAP v. EHS
2025 MT 237 (Montana Supreme Court, 2025)
Castellani v. Scranton Times, L.P.
956 A.2d 937 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 2008)