McManus v. Belcher

Ohio Supreme Court

McManus v. Belcher

652 N.E.2d 684, 73 Ohio St. 3d 106

Ohio Supreme Court·Decided August 16, 1995·No. No. 95-380·Published·Cited by 3 cases

Opinion

The appeal is dismissed, sua sponte, as having been improvidently allowed. The judgment of the court of appeals as to the issue raised on cross-appeal is reversed, and the judgment of the trial court as to cross-appellant Chrysler Corporation is reinstated on the authority of McAuliffe v. W. States Import Co., Inc. (1995), 72 Ohio St.3d 534, 651 N.E.2d 957.

Moyer, C.J., Wright, Pfeifer and Cook, JJ., concur. F.E. Sweeney, J., dissents for the reasons stated in his dissenting opinion in McAuliffe v. W. States Import Co., Inc. (1995), 72 Ohio St.3d 534, 540, 651 N.E.2d 957, 962. Douglas and Resnick, JJ., not participating.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

The appeal is dismissed, sua sponte, as having been improvidently allowed. The judgment of the court of appeals as to the issue raised on cross-appeal is reversed, and the judgment of the trial court as to cross-appellant Chrysler Corporation is reinstated on the authority of McAuliffe v. W. States Import Co., Inc. (1995), 72 Ohio St.3d 534, 651 N.E.2d 957.

Moyer, C.J., Wright, Pfeifer and Cook, JJ., concur. F.E. Sweeney, J., dissents for the reasons stated in his dissenting opinion in McAuliffe v. W. States Import Co., Inc. (1995), 72 Ohio St.3d 534, 540, 651 N.E.2d 957, 962. Douglas and Resnick, JJ., not participating.

McManus v. Belcher, 652 N.E.2d 684, 73 Ohio St. 3d 106 (Ohio 1995).

Pincite

652 N.E.2d 684 (McManus v. Belcher) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related