McMahon v. Hayes-73rd Corp.
This text of 197 Misc. 318 (McMahon v. Hayes-73rd Corp.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Motion by plaintiff to examine defendants before trial.
Plaintiff’s intestate was injured by a falling ceiling while a patient in a hospital where he was being treated and from which injuries he died. At the time he shared the room with another patient, whose identity plaintiff does not have, and swears she cannot obtain, except by questioning defendants. She needs that other patient as a witness to prove her case, she contends, and her examination is confined to one question: What is the name and address of that patient?
No case in point is cited by either side. While section 288 of the Civil Practice Act may not be used to gather names of witnesses as a general rule, I think the language of the section is sufficiently broad to require a party to divulge such information. The supporting affidavit indicates that this particular person is the only person who can testify th,at the ceiling fell on the deceased. Proof of that fact is “ material and nec[319]*319essary in the [plaintiff’s] prosecution * * * of the action (Civ. Prac. Act, § 288.) Without such proof this suit will fail. I think the facts support the application.
Motion granted. Order on notice.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
197 Misc. 318, 98 N.Y.S.2d 84, 1950 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 1740, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/mcmahon-v-hayes-73rd-corp-nysupct-1950.