McLear v. McLear, McLear
This text of 53 N.E.2d 573 (McLear v. McLear, McLear) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Judgments affirmed, with costs, on the ground that plaintiff has not shown facts sufficient to raise an issue with respect to the verity and conclusiveness of the documentary evidence establishing acquiescence and ratification on his part. The ten-year Statute of Limitations is the statute applicable. No opinion.
Concur: Lehman, Ch J., Loughran, Rippey, Lewis, Conway, Desmond and Thacher, JJ.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
53 N.E.2d 573, 291 N.Y. 809, 1944 N.Y. LEXIS 2057, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/mclear-v-mclear-mclear-ny-1944.