McLean v. State

732 So. 2d 1211, 1999 Fla. App. LEXIS 7346, 1999 WL 345275
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided June 2, 1999·No. No. 98-858·Published·Cited by 3 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Appellant argues that failure to announce imposition of restitution at sentencing or give appellant notice of the intent to impose restitution and the right to have a hearing thereon was reversible error. This issue was not, however, preserved for appeal. Locke v. State, 719 So.2d 1249 (Fla. 1st DCA 1998); Lorenzana v. State, 717 So.2d 119 (Fla. 4th DCA 1998). The remaining issues raised on appeal are without merit.

AFFIRMED.

BARFIELD, C.J., BOOTH and WOLF, JJ., CONCUR.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

McLean v. State, 732 So. 2d 1211, 1999 Fla. App. LEXIS 7346, 1999 WL 345275 (Fla. Ct. App. 1999).

732 So. 2d 1211 (McLean v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

McLean v. State
767 So. 2d 441 (Supreme Court of Florida, 2000)
Maddox v. State
760 So. 2d 89 (Supreme Court of Florida, 2000)