McLean v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

McLean v. State

732 So. 2d 1211, 1999 Fla. App. LEXIS 7346, 1999 WL 345275

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedJune 2, 1999

DocketNo. 98-858

StatusPublished

Cited by3 cases

This text of 732 So. 2d 1211 (McLean v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

McLean v. State, 732 So. 2d 1211, 1999 Fla. App. LEXIS 7346, 1999 WL 345275 (Fla. Ct. App. 1999).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Appellant argues that failure to announce imposition of restitution at sentencing or give appellant notice of the intent to impose restitution and the right to have a hearing thereon was reversible error. This issue was not, however, preserved for appeal. Locke v. State, 719 So.2d 1249 (Fla. 1st DCA 1998); Lorenzana v. State, 717 So.2d 119 (Fla. 4th DCA 1998). The remaining issues raised on appeal are without merit.

AFFIRMED.

BARFIELD, C.J., BOOTH and WOLF, JJ., CONCUR.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

Appellant argues that failure to announce imposition of restitution at sentencing or give appellant notice of the intent to impose restitution and the right to have a hearing thereon was reversible error. This issue was not, however, preserved for appeal. Locke v. State, 719 So.2d 1249 (Fla. 1st DCA 1998); Lorenzana v. State, 717 So.2d 119 (Fla. 4th DCA 1998). The remaining issues raised on appeal are without merit.

AFFIRMED.

BARFIELD, C.J., BOOTH and WOLF, JJ., CONCUR.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

732 So. 2d 1211, 1999 Fla. App. LEXIS 7346, 1999 WL 345275, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/mclean-v-state-fladistctapp-1999.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack