Home/District Court of Appeal of Florida/Lorenzana v. State

Lorenzana v. State

717 So. 2d 119, 1998 Fla. App. LEXIS 11455, 1998 WL 567970
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedSeptember 9, 1998
DocketNo. 97-2084
StatusPublished
Cited by2 cases

This text of 717 So. 2d 119 (Lorenzana v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Lorenzana v. State, 717 So. 2d 119, 1998 Fla. App. LEXIS 11455, 1998 WL 567970 (Fla. Ct. App. 1998).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The appellant claims error in resentencing when the court imposed restitution as part of his sentence for the first time on remand. However, appellant neither objected at sentencing nor filed a motion to correct the sentence pursuant to Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.800(b). Thus, the issue is not preserved for appeal. See Fla.R.App.P. 9.140(d); Hyden v. State, 715 So.2d 960 (Fla. 4th DCA 1998).

Affirmed.

STONE, C.J., and WARNER and GROSS, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

McLean v. State
732 So. 2d 1211 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1999)
Fillyaw v. State
734 So. 2d 1136 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1999)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
717 So. 2d 119, 1998 Fla. App. LEXIS 11455, 1998 WL 567970, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/lorenzana-v-state-fladistctapp-1998.