Lorenzana v. State
717 So. 2d 119, 1998 Fla. App. LEXIS 11455, 1998 WL 567970
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided September 9, 1998·No. No. 97-2084·Published·Cited by 2 cases
Opinion
The appellant claims error in resentencing when the court imposed restitution as part of his sentence for the first time on remand. However, appellant neither objected at sentencing nor filed a motion to correct the sentence pursuant to Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.800(b). Thus, the issue is not preserved for appeal. See Fla.R.App.P. 9.140(d); Hyden v. State, 715 So.2d 960 (Fla. 4th DCA 1998).
Affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Lorenzana v. State, 717 So. 2d 119, 1998 Fla. App. LEXIS 11455, 1998 WL 567970 (Fla. Ct. App. 1998).
717 So. 2d 119 (Lorenzana v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
McLean v. State
732 So. 2d 1211 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1999)
Fillyaw v. State
734 So. 2d 1136 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1999)