McLaughlin v. State

Court of Appeals of Georgia

McLaughlin v. State

207 S.E.2d 629, 132 Ga. App. 88, 1974 Ga. App. LEXIS 1607

Court of Appeals of Georgia·Decided June 12, 1974·No. 49138·Published·Cited by 5 cases

Opinions

Pannell, Judge.

Appellant was convicted of voluntary manslaughter. A motion and amended motion for a new trial were overruled by the trial court and appellant appeals.

1. Appellant enumerates that the verdict is (1) contrary to the law, (2) contrary to the evidence, and, (3) that the court erred in failing to direct a verdict for the defendant. On appeal we are compelled to construe the evidence in support of the verdict. Ryder v. State, 121 Ga. App. 796, 798 (175 SE2d 882). Suffice it to say that the evidence at trial, while conflicting, will support the jury’s verdict. The refusal of the trial judge to direct a verdict of acquittal was not error as it was not demanded as a matter of law. The enumerated errors are without merit.

2. Appellant complains that the trial court improperly withdrew a portion of the charge to the jury concerning a partial charge as to impeachment. Following the charge, appellant’s counsel objected and the trial judge asked if it was desired to have the jury recalled so that he could tell them to disregard the charge. Counsel replied "Well, we might as well.” The charge was duly withdrawn, the jury’s attention invited specifically to the objectionable portion of the charge and, [89] the jury again was directed distinctly and unequivocally, to disregard it and not to consider it. The procedure employed by the trial judge was in accord with the error curing practice approved in Central of Ga. R. Co. v. Ray, 133 Ga. 126 (1) (65 SE 281), and we find no error. However, appellant urges that this was an incorrect procedure and that the entire charge should have been withdrawn and a new charge given. We know of no authority which compels such action and we are furnished no authority for the proposition. No request for recharging was made at trial, nor do we discern any prejudice to the appellant in any event. Cf. Walker v. State, 226 Ga. 292, 294 (174 SE2d 440).

Argued March 6, 1974 Decided June 12, 1974. Robert L. Ridley, for appellant. Lewis R. Slaton, District Attorney, JoelM. Feldman, Isaac Jenrette, Morris H. Rosenberg, for appellee.

3. The remaining enumeration of error is without merit.

Judgment affirmed.

Eberhardt, P. J., concurs. Evans, J., concurs specially.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Pannell, Judge.

Appellant was convicted of voluntary manslaughter. A motion and amended motion for a new trial were overruled by the trial court and appellant appeals.

1. Appellant enumerates that the verdict is (1) contrary to the law, (2) contrary to the evidence, and, (3) that the court erred in failing to direct a verdict for the defendant. On appeal we are compelled to construe the evidence in support of the verdict. Ryder v. State, 121 Ga. App. 796, 798 (175 SE2d 882). Suffice it to say that the evidence at trial, while conflicting, will support the jury’s verdict. The refusal of the trial judge to direct a verdict of acquittal was not error as it was not demanded as a matter of law. The enumerated errors are without merit.

2. Appellant complains that the trial court improperly withdrew a portion of the charge to the jury concerning a partial charge as to impeachment. Following the charge, appellant’s counsel objected and the trial judge asked if it was desired to have the jury recalled so that he could tell them to disregard the charge. Counsel replied "Well, we might as well.” The charge was duly withdrawn, the jury’s attention invited specifically to the objectionable portion of the charge and, [89] the jury again was directed distinctly and unequivocally, to disregard it and not to consider it. The procedure employed by the trial judge was in accord with the error curing practice approved in Central of Ga. R. Co. v. Ray, 133 Ga. 126 (1) (65 SE 281), and we find no error. However, appellant urges that this was an incorrect procedure and that the entire charge should have been withdrawn and a new charge given. We know of no authority which compels such action and we are furnished no authority for the proposition. No request for recharging was made at trial, nor do we discern any prejudice to the appellant in any event. Cf. Walker v. State, 226 Ga. 292, 294 (174 SE2d 440).

Argued March 6, 1974 Decided June 12, 1974. Robert L. Ridley, for appellant. Lewis R. Slaton, District Attorney, JoelM. Feldman, Isaac Jenrette, Morris H. Rosenberg, for appellee.

3. The remaining enumeration of error is without merit.

Judgment affirmed.

Eberhardt, P. J., concurs. Evans, J., concurs specially.

McLaughlin v. State, 207 S.E.2d 629, 132 Ga. App. 88, 1974 Ga. App. LEXIS 1607 (Ga. Ct. App. 1974).

Pincite

207 S.E.2d 629 (McLaughlin v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinions

3. The remaining enumeration of error is without merit.

Related