McLaughlin v. Commissioner

12 B.T.A. 19, 1928 BTA LEXIS 3620
United States Board of Tax Appeals·Decided May 18, 1928·No. Docket No. 31445.·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

opinion.

Lansdon:

The petitioner contends that the loss sustained by deceased in 1922, through the failure of W. G. Cleveland & Co., was a “net loss,” as defined in section 204(a) of the Revenue Act of 1921, and that such loss should be carried forward as a deduction from [20] income for the succeeding taxable year. It is petitioner’s contention that deceased was regularly engaged in the wholesale drug business within the meaning of the above section, inasmuch as he was president, manager, and majority stockholder of E. E. Bruce & Co.

We are unable to agree with petitioner’s contention and approve the determination of the respondent on the authority of Harry J. Gutman v. Commissioner, 7 B. T. A. 500. See also Meyer Levy v. Commissioner, 10 B. T. A. 907; Isadore Finkelstein v. Commissioner, 10 B. T. A. 585; W. C. Harris v. Commissioner, 8 B. T. A. 1234; H. E. Newton v. Commissioner, 7 B. T. A. 1153; R. J. Palmer v. Commissioner, 4 B. T. A. 1028.

Judgment will be entered for the respondent.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

McLaughlin v. Commissioner, 12 B.T.A. 19, 1928 BTA LEXIS 3620 (bta 1928).

12 B.T.A. 19 (McLaughlin v. Commissioner) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

McLaughlin v. Commissioner
12 B.T.A. 19 (Board of Tax Appeals, 1928)