McLarty v. Bolton
This text of 191 S.W.2d 850 (McLarty v. Bolton) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Texas Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
*491 Ewing S. McLarty, Jr., has filed in this Court a motion for leave to file an original petition for mandamus against the Dean and the Board of Directors of the Texas Agricultural and Mechanical College, compelling them to permit relator to enter said college as a student. The Attorney General has filed an answer in which he contends that, this Court is without jurisdiction to try the case. We find that this Court had the identical question before it in the case of Malone v. Rainey, 133 Texas 622, 133 S. W. (2d) 951, and it was there held that the Court did not have jurisdiction in such a proceeding. See also Betts v. Johnson, 96 Texas 360, 73 S. W. 4; McFall v. State Board of Education, 101 Tex. 572, 110 S. W. 739.
The motion for leave to file the petition is therefore overruled.
Opinion delivered January 30, 1946.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
191 S.W.2d 850, 144 Tex. 490, 1946 Tex. LEXIS 85, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/mclarty-v-bolton-tex-1946.